The new trend of contemporary Urban Sociology is Comparative Urban Sociology which is represented by Gideon Sjoberg. The focus of the present study is on the type of preindustrial city. Though it is very different from contemporary point of view, th study of preindustrial city from the perspective of Comporative Sociology was formerly the field of Max Weber's study. Apart from this, it was Don Martindale who pointed out the crisis of sociological theory in American Urban Sociology. A clue to the solution to this problem, he suggested, lies in studying afresh Weber's historical establishmental research. I am interested studing Weber's city from the standpoint of above mentioned two points. Part I. a) The position of cities in Weber's studies. b) The concept of city c) Theories of city : Principles of city formation, Theory of city population, Theory of city Gemeinde. Part II. The type of city a) Oriental city vs. Occidental city b) Ancient city vs. Medieaval city c) Inland city vs. Seaside city Part III. a) Geographical infuluence to city-relevant to Weber's action theory- b) Destiny of city Gemeinde. Through the analysis of these, I want to conclude on the meaning of Max Weber's city in connection to our present Urban Sociology. I hope to emphasize that Weber's city as it is form face little future. Weber's actual analysis through the theory of city Gemeinde only is not very useful to our explanation of cities. Hence, the problem is how we make new additions to the existing Weber's theories of city formation and population and adjust it to the present context making it more meaningful to contemporary studies. But lastly, beyond and above Weber's city is truely a kind of shining tourch for us in studing Comparative Urban Sociology.