7) The transcendental method and its circulative character. There are found two phases in its circulative character; the circle of demonstration (Vaihinger) and the circle of evidence (Nelson etc.). We can get free from them by K. Fischer's explanation and the experimental method. Nevertheless there rests such a fundamental circle as pointed out by Fichte and Lotze. But it is due rather to the relativity of human nature itself than to the transcendental method. 8) The transcendental method and its formality. The transcendental principles are, according to Scheler, abstracted without consideration about a point of view of cultural history, therefore they are merely formal, nevertheless the demand to be formal is not fulfilled. For example Kant's concept of causality. But we must remark that such a demand itself is under historical conditions. 9) Many meanings of method-concept (the method of recognizing objects and the method of forming a system). We must divide these two phases of method in philosophy as well as in science. So besides the philosophical fundamental method we can find the philosophical and scientific methods of recognizing objects and the philosophical and scientific methods of forming a system in respective parts of Critique. 10) The method of classification as a procedure of forming a system (the analytic and the synthetic logic as its foundation). We can find the method of classification in architectonic. There he uses dichotomy. But he says in Critique of judgment, there are analytic and synthetic classifications, and the former is dichotomy, the latter trichotomy; that is grounded on the principle of contradiction, but this is natural and his own method. Then we must consider if he uses a different principle in case of trichotomy from the principle of contradiction. I think he doesn't. 11) The postulating method as the fundamental procedure of the method of forming a system. In a narrow sense it is the method of forming a system of Critique, but in a wide and fundamental sense it includes the method of forming a system of system (the method of classification). Because it is on the ground of postulate that we can progress from Critique of Pure Reason to Critique of Practical Reason, and on the other hand the method of classification is based on the fundamental motive of forming a system, that is just the postulating method. We can find it in the last part of Dialectic. 12) Conclusion. Neither the critical method nor the transcendental method mecessarily connects with the transcendental idealism. So the accusation that the transcendental method is subjective is not correct. The Copernicusian revolution is to be connected with the critical method, and not with the transcendental method or the experimental method -- to say nothing of the transcendental idealism.