慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AA10715861-00000114-0001  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AA10715861-00000114-0001.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :336.4 KB
Last updated :Mar 12, 2012
Downloads : 1027

Total downloads since Mar 12, 2012 : 1027
 
Title
Title A survey of national accounts in Asia for cross-country productivity comparisons  
Kana  
Romanization  
Other Title
Title  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 野村, 浩二  
Kana ノムラ, コウジ  
Romanization Nomura, Koji  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学産業研究所  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  

Name Lau, Eunice Y. M.  
Kana  
Romanization  
Affiliation  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  

Name 溝渕, 英之  
Kana ミゾブチ, ヒデユキ  
Romanization Mizobuchi, Hideyuki  
Affiliation  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
Publisher  
Place
Tokyo  
Publisher
Name Keio Economic Observatory Sangyo Kenkyujo  
Kana  
Romanization  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 2008  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
34 p.  
Source Title
Name KEO discussion paper  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 114  
Year 2008  
Month 11  
Start page  
End page  
ISSN
 
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
 
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
This paper collates country practices on compilation of national accounts in 18 Asian countries, based on the metadata gathered from a survey conducted by the Asian Productivity Organization (APO) in joint research with Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, between April and July 2008. The paper was prepared as a first step towards the construction of an international database for productivity comparisons among Asian countries.
Our observations are summed up as follows. First, although most countries are 1993 SNA compliant, the extent of compliance in terms of coverage still varies. The treatment of FISIM and software is far from standard in this country group, and methods to align GDP coverage need be considered for any cross-country comparisons. Second, employment data are more fragmented and countries are more likely to have a manufacturing census than a census on services. Third, most countries have detailed benchmark supply-use/input-output tables which can be used to supplement their national accounts. Our judgment is that GDP per worker as a labor productivity volume should be feasible for this country group, whereas GDP per hour worked will be more of a challenge due to data limitations. Industry comparative analysis of labor productivity should be feasible; but comparing total factor productivity performance, which requires capital stocks and services estimates, is feasible for only a handful of countries at the whole-economy level.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
英語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Technical Report  
Text version
 
Full text URI
 
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Feb 22, 2012 09:00:00  
Creation date
Feb 22, 2012 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Keio Economic Observatory(KEO) / KEO discussion paper / 101-149, 152
 
Related to