慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00100104-19610700-0091  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00100104-19610700-0091.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :1.2 MB
Last updated :Dec 7, 2011
Downloads : 662

Total downloads since Dec 7, 2011 : 662
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title オクスフォードにおけるアリストテレス禁令について  
Kana オクスフォード ニ オケル アリストテレス キンレイ ニ ツイテ  
Romanization Okusufodo ni okeru Arisutoteresu kinrei ni tsuite  
Other Title
Title On the condemnation of Aristotle at Oxford  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 坂口, 昂吉  
Kana サカグチ, コウキチ  
Romanization Sakaguchi, Kokichi  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大學文學部  
Affiliation (Translated) Keio gijuku University  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田史学会  
Kana ミタ シガクカイ  
Romanization Mita shigakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1961  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 史学  
Name (Translated)  
Volume 34  
Issue 1  
Year 1961  
Month 7  
Start page 91  
End page 110  
ISSN
03869334  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
In 1277, Robert Kilwardby, archbishop of Canterbury, pronounced at Oxford, the-condemnation of some Aristotelian theses including Thomist theory of unity of forms. In 1284, his successor, John of Peckham ratified his enactment. The aim of this article is to show the reason why these two archbishops issued such prohibitions against St. Thomas, one of the greatest Christian thinkers It is certain that the two archbishops thought that the theory of unity of forms threatened the traditional interpretation on dogmas on the creation and the body of Christ. But they did not ask the sanction of papal court before announcing this prohibition. So, it can be said that on the part of Roman curia, the Pope did not give any suggestion to the archbishops in issuing this condemnation. Therefore, the two archbishops are fully responsible on their action. However, they issued the condemnation not only in accordance with their personal judgement, but they followed the atmosphere of Christian world in which there were still many Augustinians. In those days circles of prelates were totally Augustinians and anti Thomists. These Augustinians were seriously concerned of the new pagan elements in the world of Christian thoughts. The enactment of Kilwardby and Peckham is the reflection of this atmosphere in the Christian world. But it is to be regretted that they failed to grasp, the situation of Thomism which was spreading rapidly in the world of Christian thought and which was adopted by the Dominican order, one of the most important supporters of the papacy, as their official opinions. If they had known better about this situation before issuing their condemnation, they would have been more careful. Their condemnation caused a serious discrepancy among the Christian world which resulted in the disintegration of medieval Christendom.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Dec 07, 2011 09:00:00  
Creation date
Dec 07, 2011 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / The historical science / 34 (1961) / 34(1) 196107
 
Related to