| Item Type |
Article |
| ID |
|
| Preview |
| Image |
|
| Caption |
|
|
| Full text |
AA00260481-20150000-0001.pdf
| Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
| Size |
:623.8 KB
|
| Last updated |
:Sep 13, 2019 |
| Downloads |
: 808 |
Total downloads since Sep 13, 2019 : 808
|
|
| Release Date |
|
| Title |
| Title |
Debt structure and capital structure : based on bank debt renegotiation
|
| Kana |
|
| Romanization |
|
|
| Other Title |
|
| Creator |
| Name |
富田, 信太郎
 |
| Kana |
トミタ, シンタロウ
|
| Romanization |
Tomita, Shintaro
|
| Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学商学部准教授
|
| Affiliation (Translated) |
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University
|
| Role |
|
| Link |
|
| Name |
池田, 直史
|
| Kana |
イケダ, ナオシ
|
| Romanization |
Ikeda, Naoshi
|
| Affiliation |
東京工業大学経営工学専攻助教
|
| Affiliation (Translated) |
Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Tokyo Institute of Technology
|
| Role |
|
| Link |
|
| Name |
辻, 幸民
|
| Kana |
ツジ, ユキタミ
|
| Romanization |
Tsuji, Yukitami
|
| Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学商学部教授
|
| Affiliation (Translated) |
Professor, Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University
|
| Role |
|
| Link |
|
|
| Edition |
|
| Place |
|
| Publisher |
| Name |
Society of Business and Commerce, Keio University
|
| Kana |
|
| Romanization |
|
|
| Date |
| Issued (from:yyyy) |
2015
|
| Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
| Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
| Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
| Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
| Physical description |
|
| Source Title |
| Name |
Keio business review
|
| Name (Translated) |
|
| Volume |
|
| Issue |
50(2015)
|
| Year |
|
| Month |
|
| Start page |
1(1)
|
| End page |
24(24)
|
|
| ISSN |
|
| ISBN |
|
| DOI |
|
| URI |
|
| JaLCDOI |
|
| NII Article ID |
|
| Ichushi ID |
|
| Other ID |
|
| Doctoral dissertation |
| Dissertation Number |
|
| Date of granted |
|
| Degree name |
|
| Degree grantor |
|
|
| Abstract |
This paper proposes a model that determines optimal capital and debt structure when a firm uses two types of debt; a bank debt and a bond. Their difference lies in whether a firm can renegotiate with a creditor or not. Renegotiation with bondholders seems to be hard because bonds are dispersively held by many bondholders. So we assume that interest payments to the bank debt can be reduced by the renegotiation when the firm goes worse but those to the bondholders cannot. Benefit of the renegotiation makes the bank debt more favorable. However, since the bank debt accompanies its additional costs, taking account of these trade-off, the firm decides optimal composition of equity, a bank debt, and a bond.
|
|
| Table of contents |
|
| Keyword |
|
| NDC |
|
| Note |
|
| Language |
|
| Type of resource |
|
| Genre |
|
| Text version |
|
| Related DOI |
|
| Access conditions |
|
| Last modified date |
|
| Creation date |
|
| Registerd by |
|
| History |
| Sep 13, 2019 | | 上位タイトル 号,上位タイトル 年 を変更 |
|
|
| Index |
|
| Related to |
|
