Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AN00150430-00000134-0033.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:365.9 KB
|
Last updated |
:Mar 30, 2015 |
Downloads |
: 3256 |
Total downloads since Mar 30, 2015 : 3256
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
集団的思考 : 集団現象を捉える思考の枠組み
|
Kana |
シュウダンテキ シコウ : シュウダン ゲンショウ オ トラエル シコウ ノ ワクグミ
|
Romanization |
Shudanteki shiko : shudan gensho o toraeru shiko no wakugumi
|
|
Other Title |
Title |
Population thinking : framework for thinking about population phenomena
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Creator |
Name |
森元, 良太
|
Kana |
モリモト, リョウタ
|
Romanization |
Morimoto, Ryota
|
Affiliation |
北海道医療大学
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
三田哲學會
|
Kana |
ミタ テツガクカイ
|
Romanization |
Mita tetsugakukai
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
2015
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
哲學
|
Name (Translated) |
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
134
|
Year |
2015
|
Month |
3
|
Start page |
33
|
End page |
54
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
Biologist Ernst Mayr says that Darwin's great contribution is to introduce into biology a new way of thinking, "population thinking." Since then, you find the phrase in many literatures on biology. According to him, it replaced typological thinking which he assumes to be based on essentialism. However Elliott Sober criticizes him for his misunderstanding of Darwin's innovation. First, I summarize Mayr's characterization of population thinking and then survey Sober's criticism. Sober says that population thinking doesn't clash with typological thinking but with Aristotle's model of essentialism which Sober calls "natural state model." Next, in order to clarify the nature of population thinking, I describe how population thinking has emerged. After Darwin, many authors, especially Francis Galton and Ronald Fisher, mathematize evolutionary theory. They change the concept of population, and a new way of thinking about normality emerges. Finally, I discuss what population thinking really brings about and argue that population thinking nowadays is essential to biology and other sciences.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
|
NDC |
|
Note |
特集 : 西脇与作君・樽井正義君退職記念
寄稿論文
|
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
|
Index |
|
Related to |
|