Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AN00150430-00000145-0163.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:373.5 KB
|
Last updated |
:Jun 15, 2020 |
Downloads |
: 2899 |
Total downloads since Jun 15, 2020 : 2899
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
シジウィックの快楽主義の特徴と問題点 : ムアによる批判を手掛かりにして
|
Kana |
シジウィック ノ カイラク シュギ ノ トクチョウ ト モンダイテン : ムア ニ ヨル ヒハン オ テガカリ ニ シテ
|
Romanization |
Shijiwikku no kairaku shugi no tokuchō to mondaiten : Mua ni yoru hihan o tegakari ni shite
|
|
Other Title |
Title |
Features and difficulties of Sidgwicks' hedonism : using Moores' criticism as a clue
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Creator |
Name |
水野, 俊誠
|
Kana |
ミズノ, トシナリ
|
Romanization |
Mizuno, Toshinari
|
Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学大学院文学研究科哲学倫理学専攻倫理学分野研究生
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
三田哲學會
|
Kana |
ミタ テツガクカイ
|
Romanization |
Mita tetsugakukai
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
2020
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
哲學
|
Name (Translated) |
Philosophy
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
145
|
Year |
2020
|
Month |
3
|
Start page |
163
|
End page |
195
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
Sidgwick's hedonism is the ethical hedonism that defines pleasure as the only ultimate good. According to Sidgwick, pleasure is a feeling that a sentient being apprehends as desirable at the time of feeling it, and the ultimate good is that which is ultimately desirable. Among Moore's criticisms of Sidgwick's hedonism, the only appropriate one is that since Sidgwick's argument has only proved that objective relation (when distinguished from pleasures) is not included as a part of ultimate good, he has not shown that Mill's hedonism (extended hedonism)--objective relation associated with pleasure as a part of ultimate good--does not hold.Which is more appropriate--Sidgwick's hedonism or Mill's? In Sidgwick's hedonism, virtue is only a means to happiness (pleasure). Therefore, his view does not adequately represent the importance of virtue. On the other hand, in Mill's hedonism, virtue is apart of hap-piness and thus should be pursued for itself. As such, Mill's view adequately represents the importance of virtue. Given the above, Mill's hedonism is more appropriate than that of Sidgwick.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
|
NDC |
|
Note |
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
|
Index |
|
Related to |
|