Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AN00150430-00000125-0105.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:1.0 MB
|
Last updated |
:Jul 3, 2012 |
Downloads |
: 10734 |
Total downloads since Jul 3, 2012 : 10734
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
「姓の選択」を語る視座 : 夫婦別姓をめぐる対立軸の明確化を通じて
|
Kana |
「セイ ノ センタク」 オ カタル シザ : フウフ ベッセイ オ メグル タイリツジク ノ メイカクカ オ ツウジテ
|
Romanization |
"Sei no sentaku" o kataru shiza : fufu bessei o meguru tairitsujiku no meikakuka o tsujite
|
|
Other Title |
Title |
The standpoint for judging marital surname choice: with clarifying the axis of confrontation
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Creator |
Name |
阪井, 裕一郎
|
Kana |
サカイ, ユウイチロウ
|
Romanization |
Sakai, Yuichiro
|
Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学大学院社会学研究科後期博士課程
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
三田哲學會
|
Kana |
ミタ テツガクカイ
|
Romanization |
Mita tetsugakukai
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
2011
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
哲學
|
Name (Translated) |
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
125
|
Year |
2011
|
Month |
3
|
Start page |
105
|
End page |
141
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
The purpose of this paper is to clarity the axis of confrontation regarding the freedom of marital surname choice and to seek for the standpoint for justifying the freedom. From analyzing the discourses on the discussion of allowing marital couples to choose separate surnames (Fuufu-bessei) and my interview research for couples with separate surnames, I attempt to show the axis of confrontation and to examine the validity of legislation of this right.
We can largely identify the different and opposite positions as four types: (A) those who insist that marital couples should have the same surnames, (B) those who support the legislation of the right for choosing separate marital surnames, (C) those who criticize the present family register (koseki) and support an ideal society based on the individuals, and (D) those who criticize the family resister but also require the legislation of the right for marital surname choice.
With this classification, this study suggests the follows. Firstly, we can not take history or tradition as the grounds for the argument. Secondly, we should not regard the freedom for choosing separate surnames in the same light as requirement for equality of sexes, feminist ideals or individualism. In effect, some feminists or individualists continue to criticize the legislation of the right for choosing separate surnames.
This study also suggests that the freedom of marital surname choice should be required in terms of not individualism but 'individual freedom'.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
|
NDC |
|
Note |
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
|
Index |
|
Related to |
|