慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000124-0053  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000124-0053.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :602.1 KB
Last updated :Jul 2, 2012
Downloads : 2520

Total downloads since Jul 2, 2012 : 2520
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title J.S.ミルとキリスト教  
Kana J.S. ミル ト キリストキョウ  
Romanization J.S. Miru to Kirisutokyo  
Other Title
Title J. S. Mill and Christianity   
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 小泉, 仰  
Kana コイズミ, タカシ  
Romanization Koizumi, Takashi  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学名誉教授  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 2010  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 124  
Year 2010  
Month 3  
Start page 53  
End page 76  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
I have tried, in this paper, to make it clear how J. S. Mill had been confronted with Christianity by meeting with his different acquaintances and discussing religious matter with them. I have divided the developmental period of his religious ideas toward Christianity into three periods, and described the changes of Mill's ideas against Christianity.
In the first period, Mill was acutely critical against Christianity in his essay such as "On Religious Persecution" in 1824. In the second period, Mill became acquainted with John Sterling and Thomas Carlyle from 1825 to 1834, and was influenced by Romanticism. So he softened his criticism against Christianity. In the third period, Mill rather returned to what he had started from, and he considered Christianity from the viewpoint of External Utilitarianism.
In the last place, I have dealt with Mill's criticism of the traditional arguments for existence of God by comparing his critical argument against existence of God with his a$rmative proof of the Principle of Utility. I have concluded that if we accept Mill's proof of the Principle of Utility, then we are obliged to accept the traditional arguments of existence of God also.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note
投稿論文
 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Jul 02, 2012 09:00:00  
Creation date
Jul 02, 2012 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 124 (201003)
 
Related to