アイテムタイプ |
Article |
ID |
|
プレビュー |
画像 |
|
キャプション |
|
|
本文 |
AN00150430-00000065-0215.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:991.3 KB
|
Last updated |
:Aug 19, 2010 |
Downloads |
: 1092 |
Total downloads since Aug 19, 2010 : 1092
|
|
本文公開日 |
|
タイトル |
タイトル |
記憶のEncoding過程 : Tulvingの仮説をめぐって
|
カナ |
キオク ノ Encoding カテイ : Tulving ノ カセツ オ メグッテ
|
ローマ字 |
Kioku no Encoding katei : Tulving no kasetsu o megutte
|
|
別タイトル |
名前 |
The encoding process of memory : on Tulving's hypothesis
|
カナ |
|
ローマ字 |
|
|
著者 |
名前 |
山田, 恭一郎
|
カナ |
ヤマダ, キョウイチロウ
|
ローマ字 |
Yamada, Kyoichiro
|
所属 |
慶応義塾大学大学院社会研究科博士課程(心理学)
|
所属(翻訳) |
|
役割 |
|
外部リンク |
|
|
版 |
|
出版地 |
|
出版者 |
名前 |
三田哲學會
|
カナ |
ミタ テツガクカイ
|
ローマ字 |
Mita tetsugakukai
|
|
日付 |
出版年(from:yyyy) |
1977
|
出版年(to:yyyy) |
|
作成日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
更新日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
記録日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
形態 |
|
上位タイトル |
名前 |
哲學
|
翻訳 |
|
巻 |
|
号 |
65
|
年 |
1977
|
月 |
1
|
開始ページ |
215
|
終了ページ |
234
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII論文ID |
|
医中誌ID |
|
その他ID |
|
博士論文情報 |
学位授与番号 |
|
学位授与年月日 |
|
学位名 |
|
学位授与機関 |
|
|
抄録 |
The purpose of this article is to introduce Tulving's hypothesis on encoding process of memory and to make some comments on the hypothesis. Tulving et al. have conducted a series of experiments on the effect of extralist cue, and have obtained a few phenomena which could not be explained by the existing theories. For instance, recall was sometimes higher than recognition, and strong extralist cue could not necessarily facilitate recall. These results are contradictory to "generation-recognition" theory which was most popular explanation of cueing effect. Tulving proposed "encoding specificity" hypothesis to explain these phenomena. In this articale "enconding specificity" hypothesis is discussed in six sections. In 1 Tulving's studies on extralist cue effect are summerizied. The results of this kind of studies lead the distinction between "availability" and "accessibility of memory. In 2 several types of encoding and decoding processes are illustrated with simple examples. The relation between two processes entails that retrieval cue can facilitate recall only if the encoding and the cue are semanticall consistent in subjects' verbal system. This viewpoint is background of Tulving's hypothesis. In 3 Tulving's "encoding specificity" hypothesis is depicted in detail and his experiments which verified the hypothesis are shown. In 4, 5, 6 affirmative and negative responses to "encoding specificity" hypothesis are cited. Specially the controvesy with Santa et al. is reviewed minutely. Lastly in 7 author's impression and opinions concerning Tulving's hypothesis, etc. are described breifly.
|
|
目次 |
|
キーワード |
|
NDC |
|
注記 |
|
言語 |
|
資源タイプ |
|
ジャンル |
|
著者版フラグ |
|
関連DOI |
|
アクセス条件 |
|
最終更新日 |
|
作成日 |
|
所有者 |
|
更新履歴 |
|
インデックス |
|
関連アイテム |
|