慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000034-0205  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000034-0205.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :2.2 MB
Last updated :Aug 24, 2010
Downloads : 785

Total downloads since Aug 24, 2010 : 785
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 歴史哲学における人類の概念  
Kana レキシ テツガク ニ オケル ジンルイ ノ ガイネン  
Romanization Rekishi tetsugaku ni okeru jinrui no gainen  
Other Title
Title The concept of mankind in the philosophy of history  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 務台, 理作  
Kana ムタイ, リサク  
Romanization Mutai, Risaku  
Affiliation 慶応義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated) Department of Philosophy of Keio University  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1958  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 34  
Year 1958  
Month 1  
Start page 205  
End page 223  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
Broadly speaking, we can consider human existence under three categories: the individual, the nation and mankind. These three categories correspond to the three concepts in logic: the individual, the particular and the universal. The former are historical concepts with historical meanings, whereas the latter are logical concepts. In the trio of the individual, the nation and mankind, the individual and the nation are historical concepts, as they denote, in the last analysis, a historical individual or a historical nation. In the past formulations in the philosophy of history, however, the concept of mankind was still far from acquiring its full historical meaning. Philosophers like Leibnitz, Voltaire, Herder and Hegel, who are the founders of the modern philosophy of history, equated mankind with the idea of Menschheit, which they considered to be the nature or essence of the individual. They did not regard mankind as something that exists really on earth like an individual or a nation. Several philosophers of history like Dilthey, Windelband and Simmel who figured prominently at the ourset of the 20th century, followed the same line of reasoning. Shortly after World War I, however, Spengler wrote Der Untergang des Abendlandes, which was followed by the philosophy of anxiety of Heidegger, Berdjajew and Jaspers. The philosophy of anxiety is an aspect of the philosophy of human existence. By this philosophy of human existence, the concept of mankind as a mere idea was gradually undermined, so to speak. As a result, nihilistic tendencies appeared. These are the same tendencies, which were already indicated by Nietzsche in his criticism of modern civilization towards the end of the 19th century. Mankind, as an actual and historical being, has been in the process of formation in the past 10 years since the end of World War II. Mankind is being gradually formed through the consciousness of its common destiny. This concept stands for a mankind which is the proponent of a movement for world peace, the exponent of the world public opinion and the carrier of international cultural and scientific advancement. The emergence of mankind as a community, I believe, has changed the concept of mankind in the philosophy of history. Mankind is no longer a mere idea of Menschheit. It is assuming, I think, a real being on earth and a new role in world history.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note
小林澄兄先生古稀記念論文集
 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 34 (195801)
 
Related to