慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00100104-19581000-0342  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00100104-19581000-0342.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :1.2 MB
Last updated :Dec 2, 2011
Downloads : 643

Total downloads since Dec 2, 2011 : 643
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 餘戸について  
Kana アマリベ ニ ツイテ  
Romanization Amaribe ni tsuite  
Other Title
Title On Amaribe (餘戸)  
Kana On Amaribe (アマリベ)  
Romanization On Amaribe (Amaribe)  
Creator
Name 村山, 光一  
Kana ムラヤマ, コウイチ  
Romanization Murayama, Koichi  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大學中等部  
Affiliation (Translated) Keio gijuku University  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田史学会  
Kana ミタ シガクカイ  
Romanization Mita shigakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1958  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 史学  
Name (Translated)  
Volume 31  
Issue 1/2/3/4  
Year 1958  
Month 10  
Start page 338  
End page 364  
ISSN
03869334  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
The word "Amaribe" means the surplus number of families. It was; fixed after the Taika Restoration (645) that fifty families should form a Sato under the newly established village system. As it was only a formal method of allocation, there remained some number of families which were not included in the Sato 里. These families were called "Amaribe" or surplus families. There is no question about the. Amaribe system itself. The question is how and under what circumstances it was established. In this respect, there have been various opinions among our historians. However, no authentic study of actual conditions of the system has been introduced until now. This was because reliable material was scarce and because the Ryo (Code) 令, which was the basic law of the period in question lacked the provisions con- cerning the Amaribe. Many of our historians accepted the description of the "Ryo-no-Gige" or the Interpretation of the Code, promulgated in 834, that in the case of a large village consisting of more than 60 families, more than 10 families out of the whole number of the families in the village formed an Amaribe. However, the writer of this article could hardly support such as opinion in theory and in practice. The writer, after inquiring into the number of the Amaribe and the places where the Amaribe were established, found the fact that even in a Kori 郡 (a county under the administrative section of those days) there was only one Amaribe and that where Amaribe were established were the county limits, seaside districts and remote places in the mountains. From the aforesaid facts, the writer has attempted to prove that when the families were allocated according to the system under which it was fixed that 50 families in a Kori should form a Sato, the odd number formed an Amaribe. Furthermore, the writer has attempted to comment on the actual condition of the Amaribe to prove that it was by no means a medley of families and that in some cases an Amaribe included some organized villages.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note
慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集
 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Dec 02, 2011 09:00:00  
Creation date
Dec 02, 2011 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / The historical science / 31 (1958) / 31(1/2/3/4) 195810
 
Related to