アイテムタイプ |
Article |
ID |
|
プレビュー |
画像 |
|
キャプション |
|
|
本文 |
AA10715861-00000162-0001.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:462.5 KB
|
Last updated |
:Oct 16, 2023 |
Downloads |
: 116 |
Total downloads since Oct 16, 2023 : 116
|
|
本文公開日 |
|
タイトル |
タイトル |
State traditions, policy networks, and governance : emerging network neutrality co-regulation in Japan and the UK
|
カナ |
|
ローマ字 |
|
|
別タイトル |
|
著者 |
名前 |
茂垣, 昌宏
|
カナ |
モガキ, マサヒロ
|
ローマ字 |
Mogaki, Masahiro
|
所属 |
|
所属(翻訳) |
|
役割 |
|
外部リンク |
|
|
版 |
|
出版地 |
|
出版者 |
名前 |
Keio Economic Observatory Sangyo Kenkyujo
|
カナ |
|
ローマ字 |
|
|
日付 |
出版年(from:yyyy) |
2021
|
出版年(to:yyyy) |
|
作成日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
更新日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
記録日(yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
形態 |
|
上位タイトル |
名前 |
KEO discussion paper
|
翻訳 |
|
巻 |
|
号 |
162
|
年 |
2021
|
月 |
6
|
開始ページ |
|
終了ページ |
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII論文ID |
|
医中誌ID |
|
その他ID |
|
博士論文情報 |
学位授与番号 |
|
学位授与年月日 |
|
学位名 |
|
学位授与機関 |
|
|
抄録 |
This paper investigates how a sub-field of regulatory policy responds to changing circumstances in the 2010s through the case studies of network neutrality regulation, a significant Internet regulation issue, by examining two examples: Japan and the UK. In so doing it reveals how a regulatory regime drawn from a specific political tradition – the preference for self-regulation - has shaped its approaches in response to external challenges and a possible transformation of the regulatory state. Although network neutrality has been a high profile issue attracting much attention among experts in the US and the EU, countries such as the UK and Japan have chosen different approaches that emphasise co-regulation by stakeholders including industry actors. The response of the UK has revealed an evolving process in which co-regulatory Open Internet approaches have changed into more explicit regulation mobilised by the initiatives of the EU but with significant involvement of the British authority. Elsewhere, with a different set of structures, the Japanese approach has preferred co-regulation rather than statutory, without advocating stronger regulatory remedies. What appears is the similarity of two examples that prefer benign approaches to this issue, although they have significantly different political traditions and structures. In pulling the above together, the paper argues that the reluctance of the state to intervene is a key characteristic of both examples, with no strong actors and structures encouraging stringent regulation, paying attention to the status of the UK and Japan as non-dominant countries in the field of the Internet and the significance of state traditions and policy networks.
|
|
目次 |
|
キーワード |
|
NDC |
|
注記 |
|
言語 |
|
資源タイプ |
|
ジャンル |
|
著者版フラグ |
|
関連DOI |
|
アクセス条件 |
|
最終更新日 |
|
作成日 |
|
所有者 |
|
更新履歴 |
Jul 19, 2021 | | インデックス を変更 |
Oct 16, 2023 | | JaLCDOI を変更 |
|
|
インデックス |
/ Public / 産業研究所 / KEO discussion paper / 101-102, 104-108, 110-119, 121-144, 147-149, 152, 155-156, 158-162, 164-168, 170, 173, 175, 177-178 |
|
|
|
関連アイテム |
|