Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AN00150430-00000087-0019.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:824.9 KB
|
Last updated |
:Sep 30, 2010 |
Downloads |
: 1524 |
Total downloads since Sep 30, 2010 : 1524
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
トマスにおける能動知性と抽象
|
Kana |
トマス ニ オケル ノウドウ チセイ ト チュウショウ
|
Romanization |
Tomasu ni okeru nodo chisei to chusho
|
|
Other Title |
Title |
Agent intellect and abstraction in Aquinas
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Creator |
Name |
中山, 浩二郎
|
Kana |
ナカヤマ, コウジロウ
|
Romanization |
Nakayama, Kojiro
|
Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学文学部
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
三田哲學會
|
Kana |
ミタ テツガクカイ
|
Romanization |
Mita tetsugakukai
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
1988
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
哲學
|
Name (Translated) |
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
87
|
Year |
1988
|
Month |
12
|
Start page |
19
|
End page |
34
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
In what sense did Aquinas use 'the agent intellect' and its operation, called 'abstraction'? In his theory of human understanding, it is necessary to posit an agent intellect. For he thought that proper human intellect is the possible intellect, which could not understand things unless it might be moved by an intelligible object. However, such an intelligible objecct does not have real existence because it is already abstracted in the process of cognition. Therefore, in order to make the intelligible objects to be real we have to posit an agent intellect. Aquinas gives explanations of supposing an agent intellect. But we may find some differences between Summa Theologiae (I. Q. 79. a. 4) and De Aniwa (Q. 4), and the operation of abstraction has neither univocal meaning nor unique mode. For instance, one mode of abstraction means "separation" and the other "generalization". I don't intend to give the complete answer to above ambiguities here. I only show that ontological and analogical ways of thoughts are mixed together and used interchangeably in his books.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
|
NDC |
|
Note |
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
|
Index |
|
Related to |
|