慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000058-0025  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000058-0025.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :903.2 KB
Last updated :Aug 19, 2010
Downloads : 1251

Total downloads since Aug 19, 2010 : 1251
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 実在的区別distinctio realisについての覚書 : 田口啓子君の批判に答える  
Kana ジツザイテキ クベツ distinctio realis ニ ツイテ ノ オボエガキ : タグチ ケイコ クン ノ ヒハン ニ コタエル  
Romanization Jitsuzaiteki kubetsu distinctio realis ni tsuite no oboegaki : Taguchi Keiko kun no hihan ni kotaeru  
Other Title
Title Remarks on real distinction between existence and essence  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 松本, 正夫  
Kana マツモト, マサオ  
Romanization Matsumoto, Masao  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1971  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 58  
Year 1971  
Month 12  
Start page 17  
End page 32  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
Actus of essence is form, and potentia of essence is matter. The form means definability of "what is", and plays the roll of determining principle ; the matter means indefinability of "what is" and plays the roll of limitting principle. According to the tradition since Pythagoras definability is "the determination by one" and indefinability is "the determination by two," or in other words, limitation. When we shift our attention from the dimension of essence to that of existence, actus and potentia, the fundamental concepts in metaphysics, come to relate themselves existence, and as a result our concern transfers to the division between actus of existence and potentia of existence. Actus of existence means esse simpliciter i.e. actus essendi, and this is existence in proper sense and is existence as determinig principle. On the otherhand, potentia of existence means esse quid as essence (whatness) i.e. modi essendi, categories of being in wider sense, and usually these are represented by the category of substance. Whatever hylo-morphological structure of substance might be, that is, either more material or more formal, the substance remains to be potentia against existence. As existence of a being proportionates to its essence, the essence itself constitutes an indispensable momentum of the existence. Not that the existence follows the essence, the essence follows the existence. Though the essence limits and conditions the existence, the essence cannot play the roll of determining in the place of existence. The roll of the essence in limitting and conditioning the existence must be preceded by the roll of existence to determine. The existence, after all, maintains its primacy over the essence. The distinction between existence and essence is real. Distinctio realis consists not only in the difference of things but also in a case, where the reason of distinction is recognized from the side of thing (a parte rei). Therefore there is exactly the same kind of distinction between existence as actus of existence and essence as potentia of existence, as that between form as actus of essence and matter as potentia of essence.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note
名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集
 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 19, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 19, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 58 (197112)
 
Related to