We must say that our moral life faces the serious crisis today. But what means all this? We always cannot get out of our morality so far as we live in fact. In this meaning the morality is the basis that constitutes and supports the human reality. Hence today's moral crisis never means the crisis of the morality itself, but means that the traditional idea of it does not conform to the morality which takes an active part in our everyday life. This paper consists of two chapters. Chapter I. has the title: "On Three Factors That Constitutes The Real Morality". And Chapter II. has the title: "On the Significance and The Ground of The Double-meaning Morality ". In Chapter 1. I understand our real morality as a dynamic movement constituted by three factors i.e. moral value, moral subject and moral question. Arid moral question as the function which forms and supports the dynamic character of morality is given an especial importance among other factors. The double-meaning morality which we often find in our everyday life, I think, results from the alienation of this dynamic character of morality. Therefore it should not be rejected as a trifle, but the method to understand correctly and conquer this alienation must be found. In Chapter II. I try to explain the significance and the ground of the double-meaning morality by inquiring into some contradictory aspects of our everyday life : The Death of God, Individuals and Social System, The Form of Historical Freedom→Liberation, Two Historical Justices and Inner Life and External Life. Lastly I refer briefly to the relation of the morality and the dialectic, which, I hope, will suggest a way to tide over the double-meaning morality i. e. the alienation of the real morality.