慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000035-0008  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000035-0008.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :2.2 MB
Last updated :Aug 24, 2010
Downloads : 1316

Total downloads since Aug 24, 2010 : 1316
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 存在論的認識論に関する覚書  
Kana ソンザイロンテキ ニンシキロン ニ カンスル オボエガキ  
Romanization Sonzaironteki ninshikiron ni kansuru oboegaki  
Other Title
Title Memorandum for the ontological epistemology  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 松本, 正夫  
Kana マツモト, マサオ  
Romanization Matsumoto, Masao  
Affiliation 慶応義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1958  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 35  
Year 1958  
Month 11  
Start page 3  
End page 25  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
This article is an approach to the epistemological problems from the ontological point of view. One of the reasons why modern philosophers chose the consciousness rather than the being as the main topic of their thinking and thus formed a subjective philosophy is that they confused the consciousness of being, which is intentio prima with the consciousness of consciousness, intentio secunda. They considered the consciousness of consciousness which is a sort of self-consciousness as a requisite for the consciousness of being. But actually the consciousness of being can be realized only with the being of consciousness and even without the consciousness of consciousness. This article explains by a phenomenological analysis how this is possible. Now Scholastics divide the process of cognition into the cognition of concept (cognitio notionis) and the cognition of judgement (cognitio judicii). It is a fact that the aposteriori verification is necessary and is possible especially concerning the cognition of judgement. But as to the cognition of concept no one can directly prove the unity between the being and the concept of being. This is the second reason of modern subjectivism. We give an indirect verification for this unity according to the aposteriori statistics which is based on the fact that the direct verification of the cognition of judgement was effectively achieved. In the cognition of judgemdnt, the consciousness of the grasp of thing-in-itself is necessary as well as the grasp of thing-in-itself, but in the cognition of concept, the grasp of thing-in-itself can exist without any consciousness of the grasp of thing-in-itself. The consciousness of grasp of thing-in-itself requires the self-consciousness while the grasp of thing-in-itself does not necessarily accompany the self-consciousness. This grasp of thing-in-itself is nothing but the consciousness of being, that is, the concept of being, which is indirectly verified in an aposteriori way. Thus the critical epistemology, when it is based upon the ontology, brings about the empirical realism.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note
I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集
 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 35 (195811)
 
Related to