慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000030-0071  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000030-0071.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :2.9 MB
Last updated :Aug 27, 2010
Downloads : 698

Total downloads since Aug 27, 2010 : 698
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 「Cogito, ergo sum」に就いて : 精神の確立と其の近代性  
Kana 「Cogito, ergo sum」 ニ ツイテ : セイシン ノ カクリツ ト ソノ キンダイセイ  
Romanization "Cogito, ergo sum" ni tsuite : seishin no kakuritsu to sono kindaisei  
Other Title
Title "Cogito, ergo sum" : Establishment of Soul and its Modernity  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 箕輪, 秀二  
Kana ミノワ, シュウジ  
Romanization Minowa, Shuji  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1954  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 30  
Year 1954  
Month 3  
Start page 71  
End page 102  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
Since Decartes made public his proposition of "Cogito, ergo sum," numerous arguments and objections have been made with regard to its historical back-ground and its logical contradictions. Especially in the modern ages, various studies on the proposition have been promoted including bibliographic study by E. Gilson; logical researches by O. Amelin and J. Lapport; studies from the religious standpoint by J. Maritain; researches from the angle of the so-called existentialism such as by K. Jaspers and J. P. Satre; in addition to the materialistic studies which purport, as having been tried by H. Lefevre in his "History of Thoughts," to solve Decartes' contradictions. In this short story, we would like to infer the proposition's significance by solving the contradictions in keeping with Decartes' methods -- the order of quest -- and the order of description. In Chapter I, an answer is give to the question what cannot be meant by "cogito" in general sense. Through this negative quest shown above, we intend to make positive solution of the proposition in Chapter II, because the negative solution would make it easier to solve positively the problem. To show what we can learn through the negative and positive solution in the above two chapters, it would be the best to quote the terms of Decartes himself as follows: "....For no one before me, so far as I know, asserted that it (i. e. the rational soul) consists in cogitation alone, or in the faculty of cogitation, or the internal principle." Chapter III treats of the significance of the establishment of a soul to distinguish the true from the false as the power of quest which is solved in chapters I and II. By regarding the establishment of the soul as a desperate challenge to Montaigne's scepticism, as E. Gilson did, we would like to appreciate highly the modernity declared by the proposition, whatsoever might be the contradictions of the proposition or the contradictions which would be interpreted as the reflection of the social dilemma in Decartes' minds. In addition, we believe that it would be one of the objects of our future researches what significance would be further shown before us by the "establishment of the soul" as well as "the modernity."
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 27, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 27, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 30 (195403)
 
Related to