慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000029-0025  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000029-0025.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :5.1 MB
Last updated :Aug 24, 2010
Downloads : 689

Total downloads since Aug 24, 2010 : 689
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title (承前)カントの哲学的方法論研究(完)  
Kana (ショウゼン) カント ノ テツガクテキ ホウホウロン ケンキュウ (カン)  
Romanization (Shozen) Kanto no tetsugakuteki hohoron kenkyu (kan)  
Other Title
Title The Study of Kant's Philosophical Methodology(The last part)  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 山本, 万二郎  
Kana ヤマモト, マンジロウ  
Romanization Yamamoto, Manjiro  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1953  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 29  
Year 1953  
Month 3  
Start page 25  
End page 66  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
7) The transcendental method and its circulative character. There are found two phases in its circulative character; the circle of demonstration (Vaihinger) and the circle of evidence (Nelson etc.). We can get free from them by K. Fischer's explanation and the experimental method. Nevertheless there rests such a fundamental circle as pointed out by Fichte and Lotze. But it is due rather to the relativity of human nature itself than to the transcendental method. 8) The transcendental method and its formality. The transcendental principles are, according to Scheler, abstracted without consideration about a point of view of cultural history, therefore they are merely formal, nevertheless the demand to be formal is not fulfilled. For example Kant's concept of causality. But we must remark that such a demand itself is under historical conditions. 9) Many meanings of method-concept (the method of recognizing objects and the method of forming a system). We must divide these two phases of method in philosophy as well as in science. So besides the philosophical fundamental method we can find the philosophical and scientific methods of recognizing objects and the philosophical and scientific methods of forming a system in respective parts of Critique. 10) The method of classification as a procedure of forming a system (the analytic and the synthetic logic as its foundation). We can find the method of classification in architectonic. There he uses dichotomy. But he says in Critique of judgment, there are analytic and synthetic classifications, and the former is dichotomy, the latter trichotomy; that is grounded on the principle of contradiction, but this is natural and his own method. Then we must consider if he uses a different principle in case of trichotomy from the principle of contradiction. I think he doesn't. 11) The postulating method as the fundamental procedure of the method of forming a system. In a narrow sense it is the method of forming a system of Critique, but in a wide and fundamental sense it includes the method of forming a system of system (the method of classification). Because it is on the ground of postulate that we can progress from Critique of Pure Reason to Critique of Practical Reason, and on the other hand the method of classification is based on the fundamental motive of forming a system, that is just the postulating method. We can find it in the last part of Dialectic. 12) Conclusion. Neither the critical method nor the transcendental method mecessarily connects with the transcendental idealism. So the accusation that the transcendental method is subjective is not correct. The Copernicusian revolution is to be connected with the critical method, and not with the transcendental method or the experimental method -- to say nothing of the transcendental idealism.
 
Table of contents
七. 先験法と循環論
八. 先験法と形式性
九. 方法概念の多義性(対象認識法と体系形成法
一〇. 体系形成法としての分類法(その根拠としての分析論理と綜合論理)
一一. 体系形成法としての要請法
一二. 結語
 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
131.113.194.249
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 29 (195303)
 
Related to