慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

ホーム  »»  アイテム一覧  »»  アイテム詳細

アイテム詳細

アイテムタイプ Article
ID
AN00150430-00000028-0037  
プレビュー
画像
thumbnail  
キャプション  
本文
AN00150430-00000028-0037.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :7.2 MB
Last updated :Aug 24, 2010
Downloads : 688

Total downloads since Aug 24, 2010 : 688
 
本文公開日
 
タイトル
タイトル カントの哲学的方法論研究  
カナ カント ノ テツガクテキ ホウホウロン ケンキュウ  
ローマ字 Kanto no tetsugakuteki hohoron kenkyu  
別タイトル
名前 The study of Kant's philosophical methodology  
カナ  
ローマ字  
著者
名前 山本, 万二郎  
カナ ヤマモト, マンジロウ  
ローマ字 Yamamoto, Manjiro  
所属 慶応義塾大学  
所属(翻訳) Keio Univerity  
役割  
外部リンク  
 
出版地
東京  
出版者
名前 三田哲學會  
カナ ミタ テツガクカイ  
ローマ字 Mita tetsugakukai  
日付
出版年(from:yyyy) 1952  
出版年(to:yyyy)  
作成日(yyyy-mm-dd)  
更新日(yyyy-mm-dd)  
記録日(yyyy-mm-dd)  
形態
 
上位タイトル
名前 哲學  
翻訳  
 
28  
1952  
3  
開始ページ 37  
終了ページ 86  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII論文ID
 
医中誌ID
 
その他ID
 
博士論文情報
学位授与番号  
学位授与年月日  
学位名  
学位授与機関  
抄録
(1) Introduction "Critique of pure reason" as Philosophical Methodology The critique is not a system, but a methodology. It is the propaedeutic to the transcendental philosophy as a system. The transcendental philosophy is the essential core of metaphysics as a science. Kant Wishes to establish metaphysics as a science ultimately. Thus the critique means the. methodology of metaphysics as a science ultimately and that of the transcendental philosophy directly. Namely it is the philosophical methodology, and not the scientific one. The philosophical methodology consists of three parts-the fundamental method, the method of recognizing objects and the method of forming a system. (2) The critical method as the fundamental method The fundamental method is the one upon which we must ultimately demand in order to construct philosophy. According to Kant, in philosophy we must first ask about the possibility of cognition, before we try to recognize any object. That means the critique of the faculty of cognition, self-critique, or reason. Namely self-cognizance or reflexion of reason means "Critique of pure reason" itself. Thus the attitude of critique as self-cognizange is the most fundamental method. (3) Reduction as the procedure of the critical method Critique means self-cognizance, As selves go diverse, there arise different standpoints. Therefore critique first means ultimately to deepen the self-range. And then it must look into the self froth the standpoint of the self that it talkes for the most fundamental one. But these two apparently different procedures really mean only the two faces of one proceeding-self-cognizanece. Thus I think the ultimate deepening of self-range as self-cognizing in this meaning is to be called. "Reduction." The critical method can be first realized by means of the procedure of reduction. (4) The transcendental method as the method of reogariizing objects -the critical method and the transcendental method Critique is the self-cognizance of reason. In other -words it is the critique of cognizance-faculty apriori in general. At the same, time it means the critique of the conceptions apriori which the cognizance-faculty possesses. Those conceptions are those of object-in-general, in other words the conditions of the possibility of recognizing objects. The cognition of those conditions means the transcendental cognition; the conceptions as the conditions mean the transcendental conceptions. These transcendental conceptions are the objects of the transcendental philosophy. So the transcendental method by which we recognize the objects js the Method of recognizing objects in philosophy. We must remark (1) the transcendental conceptions e.g. categories mean. the methodological ones in scientific methodology, but. the object-conceptions in the philosophieal methodology; (2) the critical method is to be distiliguished from the transcendental method as based upon the former. (5) The analytical and synthetical method as the procedure of the transcendental method the experimental method The procedure of transcendental method means the one by which we recognize the transcendental-faculty and conception. It is named the analytical method in Prolegomena, and the synthetical method in critique. But they are originally correlative. Strictly speaking or microscopically, the two methods are used in both Prolegomena and Critique. Only microscopically it seems that the one of the two methods, is used separately. The experimental method is, as a rule, the name given to the synthetical method, but it is originally complex, containing both methods (or procedures). The transcendental method must use the complex experimental method as its procedure.
 
目次
一. 哲学的方法論としての批判
二. 哲学的認識と哲学的方法論
三. 根柢法としての批判法
四. 批判法の手続としての還元法
五. 対象認識法としこの先験法(批判法と先験法)
六. 先験法の手続としての分析法及び綜合法(実験法)
 
キーワード
 
NDC
 
注記

 
言語
日本語  
資源タイプ
text  
ジャンル
Journal Article  
著者版フラグ
publisher  
関連DOI
アクセス条件

 
最終更新日
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
作成日
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
所有者
mediacenter
 
更新履歴
 
インデックス
/ Public / 文学部 / [哲学] 哲学 / 28 (195203)
 
関連アイテム
 

ランキング

最も多く閲覧されたアイテム
1位 新自由主義に抗す... (427) 1st
2位 斎藤隆夫の「粛軍... (340)
3位 慶應義塾図書館史... (271)
4位 認知文法から考え... (265)
5位 M&Aにおける... (263)

最も多くダウンロードされたアイテム
1位 <<Qu'... (1470) 1st
2位 新参ファンと古参... (437)
3位 731部隊と細菌戦 ... (314)
4位 日本における美容... (268)
5位 新自由主義に抗す... (267)

LINK

慶應義塾ホームページへ
慶應義塾大学メディアセンターデジタルコレクション
慶應義塾大学メディアセンター本部
慶應義塾研究者情報データベース