慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00150430-00000027-0193  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00150430-00000027-0193.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :1.7 MB
Last updated :Aug 24, 2010
Downloads : 631

Total downloads since Aug 24, 2010 : 631
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title ルソーの自然概念に就て  
Kana ルソー ノ シゼン ガイネン ニ ツイテ  
Romanization Ruso no shizen gainen ni tsuite  
Other Title
Title A Study of the Meaning of "Nature" in the Emile of J. J. Rousseau  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 村井, 實  
Kana ムライ, ミノル  
Romanization Murai, Minoru  
Affiliation 慶應義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田哲學會  
Kana ミタ テツガクカイ  
Romanization Mita tetsugakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1951  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 哲學  
Name (Translated)  
Volume  
Issue 27  
Year 1951  
Month 8  
Start page 193  
End page 204  
ISSN
05632099  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
What did Rousseau mean by "nature"? This is really one of such a kind of problem which is always both old and new. It is old because it seems to have been thoroughly disputed by many scholars of various branches of philosophical study. And yet, it remains new for us in the fact that Rousseau's "nature" cannot but be remembered and studied whenever the historical crises, political or educational, threaten us. Especially, among the pedagogues of Japan's Rousseau's "nature" has become something like an idol, and amid the educational chaos of present day Japan they are again hoisting it as a banner of their educational ideal. There are some dangers, however, in this passionate movement Some people identify it with a principle of "laissez-faire" and some understand it as a kind of barbarism and others keep it just like sentimental idol-worshippers do. All these erroneous understandings and movements result,from the ambiguity of the conception of "nature." They tried to explain it by making a classified table of its various meanings used in the Rousseau's works, or they thought it possible to throw light upon it by studying Rousseau's life or character more in details. But those strivings were all in vain. They could give us .nothing more than some perplexing informations about its ambiguity and complexity, and yet its true significance remains unknown. Isn't there any real understanding of "nature" which is one and may be the sole ground of our edticational activity? Did Rousseau inform us the one and true meaning of "nature" from the educational viewpoint? If not, why did he not or could he not describe it in a one and simple way so that he may not perplex his followers? We must find this reason, and if we can, we should lead to the ultimate understanding, of Rousseau's "nature," and accordingly to the true conception of the educational "nature." This report is a study to this purpose, that is to say, we tried to explain Rousseau's "nature," not by, as it were, a classifying metod but by faithfully following Rousseau's method of thinking.
 
Table of contents

 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Creation date
Aug 24, 2010 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / Philosophy / 27 (195108)
 
Related to