慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00100104-19691100-0079  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00100104-19691100-0079.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :1.1 MB
Last updated :Jan 19, 2012
Downloads : 577

Total downloads since Jan 19, 2012 : 577
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title サマリア発掘調査史考(二)  
Kana サマリア ハックツ チョウサシコウ (ニ)  
Romanization Samaria hakkutsu chosashiko (ni)  
Other Title
Title A historical survey of the excavations at Samaria  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 小川, 英雄  
Kana オガワ, ヒデオ  
Romanization Ogawa, Hideo  
Affiliation 慶応義塾大学  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田史学会  
Kana ミタ シガクカイ  
Romanization Mita shigakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1969  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 史学  
Name (Translated) The historical science  
Volume 42  
Issue 2  
Year 1969  
Month 11  
Start page 79(213)  
End page 97(231)  
ISSN
03869334  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
The site of Samaria in Palestine has a long history of archaeological investigations, which is represented by the twp great reports : Harvard Excavations at Samaria 1908-1910 in two volume, 1924 (by C. A. Reisner et al.) and Samaria-Sebaste in three volumes, 1942-1957 (by J. W. Crowfoot et al.). These works are worthy of close study and of careful comparison. They are both not only the essential contributions to the history of ancient Samaria, but also the text-books of the most advanced methodological ideas of Palestine archaeology in the first half of this century. It is very rewarding, or, so to speak, the only way of understanding what Palestine archaeology is, to analyse these ideas in each report and to describe their origin and development. Reisner brought the idea of systematizing field-works and recording, while Miss Kenyon combined it with her own discovery of the historical meaning of stratified loci. It seems that they introduced these novelties to Palestine from outside. Their methods are, however, not independent, nor supplementary each other, nor in opposition, but the methodological refinement acquired by Miss Kenyon at last is the fulfilment of the so-called Reisner-Fisher method, which, it is observed, was aiming without success at the same destination as hers to be reached.
 
Table of contents
四 一九〇八年の発掘
五 一九〇九-一〇年の発掘
六 一九三一-三三年及び一九三五年の発掘
 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Jan 19, 2012 09:00:00  
Creation date
Jan 19, 2012 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / The historical science / 42 (1969) / 42(2) 196911
 
Related to