慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources

慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)

Home  »»  Listing item  »»  Detail

Detail

Item Type Article
ID
AN00100104-19680600-0069  
Preview
Image
thumbnail  
Caption  
Full text
AN00100104-19680600-0069.pdf
Type :application/pdf Download
Size :1.2 MB
Last updated :Jan 24, 2012
Downloads : 572

Total downloads since Jan 24, 2012 : 572
 
Release Date
 
Title
Title 初期フランシスコ会の形態に関する一考察  
Kana ショキ フランシスコカイ ノ ケイタイ ニ カンスル イチ コウサツ  
Romanization Shoki Furanshisukokai no keitai ni kansuru ichi kosatsu  
Other Title
Title Essay on the early formative years of Franciscans  
Kana  
Romanization  
Creator
Name 坂口, 昂吉  
Kana サカグチ, コウキチ  
Romanization Sakaguchi, Kokichi  
Affiliation 慶応義塾大学文学部  
Affiliation (Translated)  
Role  
Link  
Edition
 
Place
東京  
Publisher
Name 三田史学会  
Kana ミタ シガクカイ  
Romanization Mita shigakukai  
Date
Issued (from:yyyy) 1968  
Issued (to:yyyy)  
Created (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd)  
Physical description
 
Source Title
Name 史学  
Name (Translated) The historical science  
Volume 41  
Issue 1  
Year 1968  
Month 6  
Start page 65  
End page 86  
ISSN
03869334  
ISBN
 
DOI
URI
JaLCDOI
NII Article ID
 
Ichushi ID
 
Other ID
 
Doctoral dissertation
Dissertation Number  
Date of granted  
Degree name  
Degree grantor  
Abstract
The, present article intends to show the ideals and formation of early Franciscans. There are two groups of historians who have different opinions about the early formation of the Franciscan Order. One of the groups (P. Sabatier) tried to build up the opinion that in early years, Franciscans were a society of people free from the hierarchical order. It was not the intention of St. Francis that this society would become a big systematic order under the patronage of the Church. The others (J. Jorgensen and Fr. Cuthbert) opposed this opinion and maintained that St. Francis and his followers were faithful to the Pope and the Church from the very beginning and they intended to form a new order living in honest poverty. The reason for the different opinions is the different historical materials on which historians based for their authority. The historical material for P. Sabatier's ppinion was the "Speculum Perfectionis". The materials for J. Jorgensen and Fr. Cuthbert's opinions were the First and the Second Legend of Thomas of Celano. These historical materials were written by authoritative witnesses who were Franciscans and who were themselves influenced by the division of the Franciscans into two parties, namely conventuals and spirituals. K. Esser tried to find out the real form of early Franciscanism refering to the historical materials which had no relation to the conventuals and spirituals. In this way, I have tried to show in this article, eight materials which were chronicles or letters written by people who were not Franciscans. Through these materials and the Bull which was written for the early Franciscans and also the letters written by St. Francis himself, I can come to the conclusion that Franciscans were not merely a group of lay men and women but a real religous order which had the same elements as other religous orders had. The differences were that they practiced their ideals strictly and they had some new elements. They had mobility and could enter into secular society. Their preaching and honest poverty were the elements which startled the people. Their unity was such that they had their own rules besides the strict obedience to their leader and through him to the Pope.
 
Table of contents
序論
一 史料の問題
二 修道会か否か
三 原初の理想
四 新修道会の統一的規制
五 危険とその克服
六 結語
 
Keyword
 
NDC
 
Note

 
Language
日本語  
Type of resource
text  
Genre
Journal Article  
Text version
publisher  
Related DOI
Access conditions

 
Last modified date
Jan 24, 2012 09:00:00  
Creation date
Jan 24, 2012 09:00:00  
Registerd by
mediacenter
 
History
 
Index
/ Public / Faculty of Letters / The historical science / 41 (1968) / 41(1) 196806
 
Related to