Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AN00069467-00000054-0145.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:837.2 KB
|
Last updated |
:May 25, 2023 |
Downloads |
: 94 |
Total downloads since May 25, 2023 : 94
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
Japanese Type-4 verbs are individual-level predicates
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Other Title |
|
Creator |
Name |
Tabolt, Joseph Robert
|
Kana |
テーボルト, ジョセフ ロバート
|
Romanization |
|
Affiliation |
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
慶應義塾大学言語文化研究所
|
Kana |
ケイオウ ギジュク ダイガク ゲンゴ ブンカ ケンキュウジョ
|
Romanization |
Keiō gijuku daigaku gengo bunka kenkyūjo
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
2023
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
慶應義塾大学言語文化研究所紀要
|
Name (Translated) |
Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
54
|
Year |
2023
|
Month |
3
|
Start page |
145
|
End page |
162
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
This paper analyzes the compositional behavior of Japanese Type-4 Verbs as owing to their lacking an eventuality argument and classifies them as Individual-level predicates. I propose that, as verbs with no eventuality argument, they require rescuing to be used in a sentence. This is what -te-i-ru does, contributing an eventuality argument and allowing the expression to conjoin with a Voice phrase. I also show that a generic (or otherwise quantified) DP, which operates over individuals, can also rescue Type-4 Verbs. This results in plain -ru Type-4 Verb sentences being generic or otherwise quantified, and -te-i-ru sentences being either generic/quantified or referential. The proposed difference in argument structure of stative verbs and Individual-level verbs has implications for how we define verbs and verb phrases, which have come to be equated with eventuality arguments.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
Individual-level Predicates
|
Verbal Argument Structure
|
|
NDC |
|
Note |
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
Departmental Bulletin Paper
|
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
|
Index |
|
Related to |
|