Generally speaking, a historically newer organizational form is often regarded as a logically better form. However, if the development of organizational form is rationally reconstructed based on K.R. Popper's methodology of science, the change to a newer style like matrix form or "Bunsha" form is degenerating rather than progressive. Thus, a historically newer form is not necessarily better from a logical point of view. To prove this, in this paper, first, we explain Popper's schema of the growth of knowledge. Second, on the basis of his schema, we reconstruct progressive and degenerating problemshifts of organization. Finally, we show some examples of its application to some Japanese companies.