Item Type |
Article |
ID |
|
Preview |
Image |
|
Caption |
|
|
Full text |
AA10715861-00000114-0001.pdf
Type |
:application/pdf |
Download
|
Size |
:336.4 KB
|
Last updated |
:Feb 20, 2024 |
Downloads |
: 1262 |
Total downloads since Feb 20, 2024 : 1262
|
|
Release Date |
|
Title |
Title |
A survey of national accounts in Asia for cross-country productivity comparisons
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Other Title |
|
Creator |
Name |
野村, 浩二
|
Kana |
ノムラ, コウジ
|
Romanization |
Nomura, Koji
|
Affiliation |
慶應義塾大学産業研究所
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
Name |
Lau, Eunice Y. M.
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
Affiliation |
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
Name |
溝渕, 英之
|
Kana |
ミゾブチ, ヒデユキ
|
Romanization |
Mizobuchi, Hideyuki
|
Affiliation |
|
Affiliation (Translated) |
|
Role |
|
Link |
|
|
Edition |
|
Place |
|
Publisher |
Name |
Keio Economic Observatory Sangyo Kenkyujo
|
Kana |
|
Romanization |
|
|
Date |
Issued (from:yyyy) |
2008
|
Issued (to:yyyy) |
|
Created (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Updated (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
Captured (yyyy-mm-dd) |
|
|
Physical description |
|
Source Title |
Name |
KEO discussion paper
|
Name (Translated) |
|
Volume |
|
Issue |
114
|
Year |
2008
|
Month |
11
|
Start page |
|
End page |
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
DOI |
|
URI |
|
JaLCDOI |
|
NII Article ID |
|
Ichushi ID |
|
Other ID |
|
Doctoral dissertation |
Dissertation Number |
|
Date of granted |
|
Degree name |
|
Degree grantor |
|
|
Abstract |
This paper collates country practices on compilation of national accounts in 18 Asian countries, based on the metadata gathered from a survey conducted by the Asian Productivity Organization (APO) in joint research with Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, between April and July 2008. The paper was prepared as a first step towards the construction of an international database for productivity comparisons among Asian countries.
Our observations are summed up as follows. First, although most countries are 1993 SNA compliant, the extent of compliance in terms of coverage still varies. The treatment of FISIM and software is far from standard in this country group, and methods to align GDP coverage need be considered for any cross-country comparisons. Second, employment data are more fragmented and countries are more likely to have a manufacturing census than a census on services. Third, most countries have detailed benchmark supply-use/input-output tables which can be used to supplement their national accounts. Our judgment is that GDP per worker as a labor productivity volume should be feasible for this country group, whereas GDP per hour worked will be more of a challenge due to data limitations. Industry comparative analysis of labor productivity should be feasible; but comparing total factor productivity performance, which requires capital stocks and services estimates, is feasible for only a handful of countries at the whole-economy level.
|
|
Table of contents |
|
Keyword |
|
NDC |
|
Note |
|
Language |
|
Type of resource |
|
Genre |
|
Text version |
|
Related DOI |
|
Access conditions |
|
Last modified date |
|
Creation date |
|
Registerd by |
|
History |
Feb 20, 2024 | | JaLCDOI,Abstract 内容 を変更 |
|
|
Index |
/ Public / Keio Economic Observatory(KEO) / KEO discussion paper / 101-102, 104-108, 110-119, 121-144, 147-149, 152, 155-156, 158-162, 164-168, 170, 173, 175, 177-178 |
|
|
|
Related to |
|